5 BASIT TEKNIKLERI IçIN C# ISTRUCTURALEQUATABLE NERELERDE KULLANıLıYOR

5 Basit Teknikleri için C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor

5 Basit Teknikleri için C# IStructuralEquatable nerelerde kullanılıyor

Blog Article

If equality is hamiş needed for the derived class you emanet skip IEquatable but you need to override the CanEqual to prevent it being equal with base classes (unless of course they should be considered equal).

Now, when we call Equals ourselves it will directly call our new fancy Equals that takes in a ScreenMetrics, which is great.

Reference types (read classes) don't benefit birli much. The IEquatable implementation does let you avoid a cast from System.Object but that's a very trivial gain. I still like IEquatable to be implemented for my classes since it logically makes the intent explicit.

Daniel A.A. PelsmaekerDaniel A.A. Pelsmaeker 49.2k2121 gold badges112112 silver badges160160 bronze badges 5 In addition to answers which point to duplicate hashcodes birli is documented behavior, some reasoning and reflection would also lead you to the same conclusion.

It is used by the third example birli an argument to the Equals(Object, IEqualityComparer) method of the IStructuralEquatable interface that tuples implement. It compares two Double or two Single values by using the equality operator. It passes values of any other type to the default equality comparer.

– Royi Namir Commented Mar 3, 2012 at 18:04 @RoyiNamir user844541's answer is correct, but maybe it is still hard for you to understand without a concrete example, if you are familiar with IEqualityComparer and how it is used by Linq's Distinct(), then after check the source code to see how it implement IStructuralEquatable on referencesource.microsoft.com/#mscorlib/system/collections/…, then you will see how it work.

1 My understanding is that it's used for collection like types, and encapsulates the structural part of the comparison, but leaved the comparison of the elements to a comparer passed in by C# IStructuralEquatable nedir the user. But I'm not really sure if I really got it.

In my implementation I delegated the task of calculating hash codes to the internal array. While testing it, to my great surprise, I found that my two different arrays had the same structural hash code

Coming soon: Throughout 2024 we will be phasing out GitHub Issues as the feedback mechanism for content and replacing it with a new feedback system. For more information see: .

Bu örnekte, articles1 ve articles2 dizileri aynı makale mebdelıklarına aynı sırada ehil olduğundan, CompareTo metodu 0 döndürerek bu dizilerin yapısal olarak bedel bulunduğunu belirtir.

Kemiksiz on a certain ortam, I'm compelled to issue the standard warning not to rely on the values of hashcodes or how they are computed, since it is derece guaranteed to be the same across updates or platforms.

IStructuralEquatable is used with arrays to determine whether the arrays are structurally equal. The StructuralEqualityComparer.Equals method is used for this purpose.

Here the comparison is different for value type arrays and custom arrays. In .Kemiksiz 4.0 int, string will internally implement IEquatable for custom types we have to externally implement the IEquatable.

Bunun tarafı sıra, IStructuralComparable arayüzü, yetişekınızı elan modüler hale getirir ve kod yineını azaltır. Farklı done kuruluşları beyninde yapısal alınlaştırma emeklemlerini uslu bir yerde yönetebilir ve kodunuzun bakımını kolaylaştırabilirsiniz.

Report this page